PRESS RELEASE Cuts to Humanities and Social Sciences Research Will Impact Māori Most
December 6, 2024
PRESS RELEASE
Cuts to Humanities and Social Sciences Research Will Impact Māori Most
The Pou Matarua Co-directors of Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga, Aotearoa’s only Māori Centre of Research Excellence (NPM) strongly condemn the Government’s decision to defund social science and humanities research within the Marsden Fund. They say Māori researchers, communities, and knowledge systems stand to suffer the most.
“Social science and humanities research is crucial to understanding the cultural and wider contexts and systems that we all live in. It forms the basis for understanding the drivers behind why people thrive socially and economically,” says Professor Waimarie Nikora.
“It is short-sighted and reckless to cut crucial funding in these areas and it will be detrimental to long term economic and social well-being. Research on Māori health, education, and social wellbeing reduces systemic barriers and equips more New Zealanders to contribute effectively to the economy,” she says.
“Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga has been a world leader in developing approaches that work across all disciplines to solve problems and with mātauranga Māori at the heart of what we do.”
The funding cuts will also have an outsized impact on the Māori community.
"We know that Māori researchers, communities, and knowledge systems stand to suffer the most from this decision,” says Pou Matarua Professor Tahu Kukutai. “In 2024, Māori made up 13% of all Marsden funded investigators. Take away the humanities and social sciences panel, and that plunges to just 5.5%. This decision defunds Māori research and Māori researchers by stealth."
Professor Kukutai says it makes no sense to disinvest in the next generation of Māori scholars when the government has repeatedly recognised the urgent need to grow the Māori research workforce. "Humanities and social sciences are foundational to advancing and nurturing the next generation of Māori scholars. Without this funding avenue, the future for them looks pretty grim."
For interviews please contact: cindy.mcquade@auckland.ac.nz
Open Letter to the President of the Royal Society Te Apārangi, Distinguished Professor Dame Jane Harding DNZM FRSNZ FRACP
1 November 2024
Open Letter to the President of the Royal Society Te Apārangi, Distinguished Professor
Dame Jane Harding DNZM FRSNZ FRACP
E te Kahurangi, e Jane, tēnā koe,
The Māori signatories to this letter have strong associations to a broad range of tertiary institutions and professional bodies. Our academic and research expertise likewise extend across multiple areas of interest, endeavour and activity. Despite this diversity, we have always been unified in our efforts to support the growth and development of our people, to ensure that our collective aspirations are advanced and that any barriers are removed.
In this regard, we would like to express, in the strongest possible way, the concerns we have with the proposed changes to governance of the Royal Society Te Apārangi (RSTA). As an organisation built on democratic and representative governance processes, the proposed shift towards a top-down, Fellow-driven board model under the auspices of ‘best practice’ is troubling. This proposal not only threatens to dismantle the progress made to support and enhance Māori participation and rangatiratanga over the past decade, but also undermines the principle of partnership and rite-tahi as enshrined in the articles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Over the last ten years, RSTA has made significant and commendable changes including the creation of the Pou Tiaki Director Māori role to support the use of te ao Māori and tikanga Māori concepts within its structure and processes. These institutional advancements required sustained advocacy from the Māori Academy, and marked a pivotal shift from the monocultural foundations of the Society towards an institution that better reflects the uniqueness and vibrancy of our nation. Enhanced recognition of Māori science aspirations has facilitated a significant increase in Māori Fellows from just nine in 2015 to 40 by 2023, a Tiriti o Waitangi provision in the General Rules, establishment of the Māori Electoral College and two permanent Māori positions on the Council, as well as the introduction of new research medals that recognise Māori achievements in science in collaboration with Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga Centre of Research Excellence. These advancements have been widely acknowledged internationally, further emphasising the organisation’s unique commitment to Indigenous science approaches amongst our international peers.
The current proposal therefore raises significant concerns and places at considerable risk the progress made over the past decade. It signals a retreat from the inclusive governance model we have been working towards and lacks any meaningful consideration of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
The proposal lacks a well-founded rationale for such a substantial change, raising questions about the sincerity of this process. The consultation process has been rushed and top-down in nature. Moreover, the suggested governance restructure is out of step with the Society’s recently released strategic plan, which provides assurances to honour the spirit and intent of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and ensure Māori voices are central in decision-making, whilst affirming RTSA’s values of collaboration, diversity, integrity and transparency. The inconsistency between the proposed restructure and the strategic vision raises serious questions about the Society's commitment to its own values and aspirations. These are not minor inconsistencies and further call into question the legitimacy and integrity of the consultation process.
To this end, and while the proposal may appear to allow for Māori participation, it fails to recognise the fundamental right of tangata whenua to tino rangatiratanga - the right to make decisions for ourselves, and to exercise authority over our own people, lands and knowledges. Under Te Tiriti, the governance structure of RSTA must reflect a true partnership between Māori and the Crown. This means explicit inclusion of Māori representatives mandated by the Māori membership at the governance level, where decisions that impact Māori are made by Māori, not for Māori. The current proposal falls well short of this.
The proposed restructure also comes at a time when RSTA has entered a tripartite academy partnership with the Australian Academy of Science and The Royal Society of Canada, with an emphasis on the rights of Indigenous peoples and how the academies may give effect to their responsibilities toward Indigenous engagement and inclusion. In this context, where RSTA is engaging with international Indigenous communities, the proposed governance changes appear disingenuous. It is contradictory for RSTA to promote Indigenous leadership and partnership abroad while simultaneously removing dedicated Māori representation from its own governance body.
We hope to work collaboratively to uphold the principles of partnership and inclusion and continue the progress that has been made towards a truly bicultural and future focused academy. If there is no visible space for Māori decision-making in this reimagined structure, the creation of an independent Māori Academy may be the path forward.
Dame Jane, we urge you to reconsider the current governance proposal, which we view as a significant step backwards, and call for a pause in the current consultation process. There must be genuine engagement with Māori from the outset, in line with Te Tiriti, to ensure that RSTA remains a place where Māori voices are heard and our aspirations are enabled.
We appreciate your careful consideration of the concerns we have raised and look forward to
receiving your reply.
Ngā manaakitanga,
Professor Melinda Webber (Waipapa Taumata Rau), former RSTA Councillor
Professor Tahu Kukutai FRSNZ (Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga), former RSTA Councillor
Professor Linda Waimarie Nikora FRSNZ (Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga), former RSTA Councillor
Professor Te Kani Kingi (Te Whare Wananga o Awanuiārangi), former RSTA Councillor
Professor Reremoana Theodore (Ōtākou Whakaihu Waka), former RSTA Councillor
Distinguished Professor Linda Tuhiwai Smith CNZM FRSNZ (Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi), former RSTA Councillor
Emeritus Professor Ngahuia Te Awekōtuku MNZM CRSNZ (Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga)
Distinguished Professor Graham Hingangaroa Smith CNZM FAERA FRSNZ (Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa)
Distinguished Professor Sir Hirini Moko Mead KNZM FRSNZ (Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi)
Distinguished Professor Jacinta Ruru MNZM FRSNZ (Ōtākou Whakaihu Waka)
Professor Tracey McIntosh MNZM (Waipapa Taumata Rau)
Professor Rangi Matamua ONZM FRSNZ (Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa)
Professor Poia Rewi FRSNZ (Te Mātāwai)
Dr Leonie Pihama FRSNZ (Tū Tama Wāhine o Taranaki)
Professor Joanna Kidman FRSNZ (Te Herenga Waka)
Professor Helen Moewaka Barnes FRSNZ (Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa)
Dr Carwyn Jones FRSNZ (Te Wānanga o Raukawa)
Professor Rawinia Higgins FRSNZ (Te Herenga Waka)
Professor Margaret Mutu FRSNZ (Waipapa Taumata Rau)
Professor Michelle Thompson-Fawcett FRSNZ (Ōtākou Whakaihu Waka)
Professor Denise Wilson FRSNZ (Te Wānanga Aronui o Tāmaki Makau Rau)
Dr Sonja Macfarlane FRSNZ (Ngāti Waewae)
Professor Brendan Hokowhitu FRSNZ (University of Queensland)
Dr Mahonri Owen (Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato), Early Career Researcher Forum Co-Chair & Māori Electoral College
Sarah-Kay Coulter, Māori Electoral College
Professor Matthew Roskruge (Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa), Māori Electoral CollegeAssociate
Professor Moana Waitoki (He Paiaka Totara, Māori Psychologists Network), Māori Electoral College
Professor Bridgette Masters-Awatere MRSNZ FNZPsS (Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato), Māori Electoral College
Dr Amohia Boulton (Whakauae Research Services Ltd), Māori Electoral College
Professor Jason Mika (Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato), Māori Electoral College
Dr Nimbus Staniland (Waipapa Taumata Rau), Māori Electoral College
Download a copy of this letter:
Traditional Knowledge and Research Ethics Conference 2004 Proceedings
Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga’s inaugural Traditional Knowledge Conference was held in June 2004. The theme of this international conference was traditional knowledge and research ethics. The authors of the papers come from Australia (Torres Straits Islands), the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Tonga, and from many iwi and organisations of Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Research has long played a critical role in working with indigenous communities, their ways of knowing, languages, values and practices. This role has been contentious for the communities being researched. While other marginalised communities, for example, women, have developed academic critiques of research that have radically transformed research practices, indigenous communities continue to struggle to have their critical voices “heard” and “respected” by academic and research communities and organisations.
The idea of “ethical practices” is one of the meeting grounds for institutions, researchers and communities and the aim of the conference was to create such a meeting ground. The conference identified a range of matters that have particular relevance for Māori and indigenous communities in the twenty first century, including issues related to indigenous systems of knowledge, contemporary forms of art and representation, biotechnology, international agreements, and conservation and protection.